On Monday, October 12, 2015 09:25:43 PM Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:24:02AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Additionally, looking ahead to the next transition that makes python3.5 > > the > > default python3, it would be good to look at the packages that build-dep > > on > > python3-dev and see if it's reasonable to have them build-dep on > > python3-all- dev and build for all supported python3 versions. > > > > Packages that only build for the default version will break until rebuilt > > as soon as the default changes, whereas extensions that are built for all > > supported python3 versions continue to work just fine. The fewer default > > only packages we have, the less breakage goes with changing the default > > [2]. I have not investigated these at all. > > [...] > > And then > > > [2] > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?filename=python3-dev.list;b > > ug=798999;msg=84;att=1 > which says: > > Reverse-Build-Depends > ===================== > [...] > * libreoffice > [...] > > Please, not this discussion again. :)
snip of detailed discussion about why not LO. Thanks for the detailed analysis. OK, let's not investigate that one any further. Scott K P.S. No need to CC me as I am subscribed.
