On 10/06/2015 03:31 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On October 5, 2015 8:42:40 PM EDT, Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au> > wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 09:33 Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Except in this case you not only didn't but then got defensive when >> called >>> on it. If you'd just reacted with something like "Oops, made a >> mistake, >>> I'll >>> revert it from svn and ask for it to be removed from experimental." >>> (fortunately for experimental we can do that) then this wouldn't have >> been >>> a big deal. >>> >> >> I get the impression that the complaint was "process wasn't followed" >> as >> opposed to "I didn't want that package in experimental". So unless I am >> mistaken, there doesn't seem to be any need to remove the package from >> experimental. In this particular case. > > I think that generally when one transgresses on someone else's package in a > way the maintainer doesn't like it's the responsibility of the transgressor > to offer to fix it.
I was told not to commit anymore. Thomas
