On sam. 03 oct. 2015 à 16:15:53, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Pierre-Elliott Bécue, 2015-10-03] > > Yes, do-it-o-craty is good, at some point, but this is exactly what brought > > Thomas out. So nope, it's not enough. > > and if I didn't do it, it would be better because... > It's easy to point fingers if it's not you who cleans after each mess.
You didn't get my point. As previously said, I heard and understood your answer, I'm not trying to going back on what I said. But this new argument about doitocraty VS. democracy is something interesting to discuss about. I was meaning that Thomas probably acted as a doitocraty recommends to, and that's what led to this situation, with him out of the team. I beleive there is a need to create some democratic processes in a team, that's all. > /me (AKA dictator who'd love to give all his powers to someone else) who > still stands by his decision and would do it again. > The only regret is that I didn't do it a year ago. I'm not able to judge on this, as I'm not aware of all the stories, neither do I have enough experience. -- PEB
