❦ 9 août 2015 13:46 +0200, Lennart Weller <l...@ring0.de> : >> Everything looks good except the LICENSE.txt which is not here. It is in >> fact called LICENSE upstream and it should be added to the manifest to >> be present in the tarball. A note to upstream would be nice. Add a >> comment to debian/copyright pointing to the appropriate URL to find the >> license. As it is present in debian/copyright, you don't have to add a >> special patch or anything like that. > > What do you mean here? The LICENSE file is part of the git repo on > Github but not in the tarball on PyPI which is the base of the package. > Also the machine-readable copyright file basically includes the same > license and copyright notice as the LICENSE file from the git repo.
Yes. I just said exactly that, didn't I?
I also propose that you add a small comment in debian/copyright
explaining that the license is not present in the tarball (which is a
bug, upstream should add it to MANIFEST.in) but can be checked on
GitHub.
--
Don't use conditional branches as a substitute for a logical expression.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
