On May 23, 2015 12:42:35 PM EDT, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: >On Friday, May 22, 2015 02:17:59 PM Ian Cordasco wrote: >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tristan Seligmann >> >> <mithra...@mithrandi.net> wrote: >> > On 22 May 2015 at 16:06, Tristan Seligmann ><mithra...@mithrandi.net> >wrote: >> >> Or are you saying that the ipaddress backport is not compatible >with >> >> python3 stdlib's ipaddress? (This would be a very unfortunate >state of >> >> affairs, but impossible to imagine) >> > >> > This should have been "*not* impossible", of course. >> >> Based purely on the fact that the current version of ipaddr is >> undocumented, I would strongly be against any patch to packaged >> software that causes a dependency on it for the sole purpose of >> Debian's packaging of that software. You're asking the maintainers of >> those packages to maintain patches for things that are undocumented. >> In my opinion, Scott, if your'e so adamant about not packaging >> ipaddress for Python 2, you should work with ipaddr to fix things so >> maintainers can reliably maintain the software. Until that is fixed, >I >> think Tristan's packaging should move forward so Debian doesn't fall >> too far behind pip. > >Here's the patch that pip needs to work with ipaddr (I did this against >the >development branch, but I'd be surprised if it doesn't work for the >latest >release): > >http://paste.debian.net/182618/ > >dstufft has reviewed it and I'll submit a github pull request once I >get my >password reset.
The final version uses nested try/except instead of try/except/finally and has been accepted upstream. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/b98fad5e-9fec-4737-84a7-a23c2e691...@kitterman.com
