Le Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:03:53AM +0200, Ole Streicher a écrit : > > The Debian Policy [4] states (9.1.1): > > | 1. The FHS requirement that architecture-independent application- > | specific static files be located in /usr/share is relaxed to a > | suggestion. In particular, a subdirectory of /usr/lib may be used by a > | package (or a collection of packages) to hold a mixture of > | architecture-independent and architecture-dependent files. However, > | when a directory is entirely composed of architecture-independent > | files, it should be located in /usr/share. > > which is a bit contradicting to the current practice: If it is just a > suggestion, then maybe the lintian warning has not right severity > "warning" and should be lowered? And are pure python packages > (Architecure: all) not covered by the last sentence and should *not* be > in /usr/lib/ by policy?
Hi Ole, indeed, this is a recent change in the Policy (see bugs.debian.org/741304). Probably Lintian is lagging behind. Maybe somebody can ping bug #415558 ? Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150511085555.ge1...@falafel.plessy.net
