On Apr 23 2015, Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> wrote: > There *are* however proven, stable tools that improve the Python coding and > maintenance experience and for me, tox is one of those. There are others, > such as nose2, that I won't even start a new project without adopting from the > first commit.
Are you by any chance also familiar with pytest and could same a few word about pros/cons? I've chosen pytest over nose1 because of the richer feature set for writing tests, but I think in several cases pytest is suffering from its own complexity (eg. https://bitbucket.org/pytest-dev/pytest/issue/635/). Reading your comment I was wondering if nose2 might be a better choice, but the nose2 manual wasn't very informative at all (I actually did not found any information about how to write tests). Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
