> This discussion has been had many times before over many years. Of late, the
and it was never driven by the problems we have, but just by "oh look how cool git is", "everybody else is using it, and i'm too lazy to learn a new tool" arguments. > difficulty in switching VCS has been the blocker. I don't think there are > many people who are unconvinced that switching makes sense from a technical > or workflow perspective. I also don't think there are many people who are > interested in rehashing the entire discussion yet again. It's almost as > boring as systemd discussions. sure, do as you want, git is a great DVCS, and all the other teams are using it > Subversion lacks features that make packaging work much easier to do. The > tools shape what you do -- you said that you don't use branches or log much > and that's going to be partly because they are so crap in svn. In the past, OTOH don't assume I never used git for packaging; even in that case I rarely *need* to use log; regarding branching it might be useful for huge changes (even if I consider it only useful when developing, not packaging) but the majority - come on - of those dont require branching (or do you branch to change Standard-Versions, or to update debian/watch?). turning down my arguments because "your wf is flawed because you use crappy tool" is kinda weak but I'll accept it. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cab4xwxyatibd22rs7j-7pdebjbzjn6z+cazzskua538yrix...@mail.gmail.com
