Hi Raphael. I've run out of time (gotta pack for DC14), but thanks for your reply. Lots of good information there. A couple of quick things:
On Aug 22, 2014, at 11:46 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >When you analyzed git-dpm, the lack of debian was a negative point, so it >would be weird to want to remove it here. I (think I) mention this in my post, but while it was annoying, I can kind of see the logic of it. Not having a debian/ directory in the patch branch removes the temptation to use quilt directly. Have to think/play more... >Why would you push your temporary branch? Only because `git push --all` seems like the obvious choice. But I think git's cli is akin to quantum mechanics, i.e. don't trust your intuition. :) >I know this can happen if you do "git push --all" but that command is >not a good idea in general... you can do "git push origin :" to push all >the branches that are pre-existing on the remote side. See what I mean? :) >It would be nice if the admins could whitelist all mails containing >an "X-Git-Repo" header. In Mailman, that's easy. >Or at least whitelist all *@users.alioth.debian.org emails as those are in >the From of those emails. (I just changed a setting so that it uses this >domain now) In Mailman, that's easy. >Alternatively you can subscribe to the list with your ><login>@users.alioth.debian.org mail and disable mail delivery for that >address. In Mailman, that's easy. Anybody know the maintainer of the mailing list? >> We should probably also connect the commit hooks up to IRC as is the case >> with svn-bp. I don't know about you, but I definitely do not want more >> email traffic. Notifications in IRC are fine, more email is not! :) > >I did just setup the IRC notifications and also enabled >/usr/local/bin/git-post-receive-tag-pending that will tag the closed bugs >as pending. I just saw that! I was worried I was hallucinating yesterday, but instead, I just thank you for setting it up. :) Cheers, -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
