On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Jun 02, 2014, at 04:43 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > > >Sounds reasonable to me, the only “downside” is that virutalenv will > default > >to Python 3, which is probably not what most people want (however they > >can do virtualenv -p python2). > > Barry, would it be sensible to default to python2 (so keep existing outside behaviour unchanged) and then only after a grace period and enough announcements make python3 the default? To me doing it right now seems like breaking lots of scripting for no good reason. Thanks ZK > But it's what most people *should* want <wink>. > > Seriously though, I wonder if this is a problem or if some transition or > wider > announcement needs to be made. > > -Barry >
