On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 14:19:32 +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > Jakub Wilk <[email protected]> writes: > > > * Olivier Berger <[email protected]>, 2013-12-16, 13:24: > >>- add a python-rdflib-tools package that contains shell scripts of the > >>form : > >> > >> #!/bin/sh > >> > >> exec /usr/bin/python -m rdflib.tools.csv2rdf $* > > > > I can't see how that's better than a script with #!/usr/bin/python > > shebang... > > > > Well... it's essentially easier than altering the modules to provide > them with a sheebang, making them executable and shipping > symlinks... whose targets wouldn't be the same in the v2 and v3 > package... > > >>- make this package depend on python-rdflib | python3-rdflib > > > > /usr/bin/python can't use the modules shipped by python3-rdflib. > > > > Ah, thanks for spotting this... I thought it was a bit too easy indeed > ;) > > Hmmm... Maybe this is better : > > #!/bin/sh > > /usr/bin/python3 -c 'import rdflib.tools.csv2rdf' 2>/dev/null > if [ "$?" = "0" ] > then > exec /usr/bin/python3 -m rdflib.tools.csv2rdf $* > else > exec /usr/bin/python -m rdflib.tools.csv2rdf $* > fi > > What do you think ? > FWIW I think it's terrible and you should just pick one, and ship that.
Cheers, Julien -- Julien Cristau <[email protected]> Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/ Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
