Le Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:30:01AM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > * Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu>, 2013-12-04, 10:41: > > >Well, there was a lenthy discussion, uscan bug, Wiki page trying > >to summarise everything. The people who contributed did not > >brought up your (and Paul's concern) and I guess Charles Plessy > >would have been in favour of using d/upstream. I do not think it > >is my fault if you did not raised you voice when it was time ... > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/20130116133513.ga4...@jwilk.net
(actually https://lists.debian.org/20130116133513.ga4...@jwilk.net) Hi Jakub, Debian has what its developers implement. I am sure that if somebody steps up and does the actual work of implementing a better solution and migrating the existing information, Andreas will complain. If out of our thousands of developers, only one person did a work (and is not in situation of monopoly), then we should not veto the outcome on the basis that somebody else could have done it better. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131204105810.gc21...@falafel.plessy.net
