Hi all,

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> wrote:
>> sphinxcontrib:
>>  pymodules: [python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker,
>> python-sphinxcontrib.spelling]
>>  site-pkgs: [python-sphinxcontrib.actdiag, python-sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme,
>> python-sphinxcontrib.seqdiag, python-sphinxcontrib-programoutput,
>> python-sphinxcontrib.blockdiag, python-sphinxcontrib.nwdiag,
>> python-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain, python-sphinxcontrib.phpdomain]
> Work-around implemented in python-sphinx.

I am currently experimenting¹ with porting sphinx to dh_python2. Do I
get it correctly that the workaround should be kept so that
dh_pysupport-using packages can integrate using dh_python2-based
Sphinx?

[¹]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sphinx/news/20131006T183354Z.html

--
Dmitry Shachnev


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cakimphuyesmyougbaarkznl0y-hglyry4_e-4sx3pzh1re4...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to