"Piotr Ożarowski" <pi...@debian.org> wrote:
>[Yaroslav Halchenko, 2013-01-20]
...
>> wouldn't it make more sense to ship it in a separate package since it
>is
>> relevant not only for python3? then it would also make possible to
>> provide backport packages
>
>yes, it makes sense. We already talked about it on IRC (to move
>pybuild, py{3}{clean,compile}, dh_python{2,3} and debpython to a new
>source package and make it work also with pypy).
What about just extending python{,3}-defaults to support pypy and not
reorganizing everything again?
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/3fdd5045-7f6d-4f8e-b86d-074d00c3b...@email.android.com
