On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:13, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: > I don't think that the *-defaults packages and the interpreter packages > fundamentally require the same maintainer, but I expect it to be problematic > to have different teams maintain them if each team has the other as a member > as > they are both strong personalities.
could you please elaborate a bit? what is the problem you see? *-defaults define the policy and the default version of python, while python* is just the interpreter packages (big packages, but not even *that* complicated; f.e. the most scary point, problems on weird archs, is currently delegated to porters). I don't even see that much collaboration needed here (not that it would hurt), so I'd like to hear your doubts. > So far, the solicitation has been for co-maintainers with morph. I think it > would only be fair to make a similar call for co-maintainers with doko. Stefano already explained to you, but that would have been fair if doko had asked for it. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cab4xwxydipdro2nxi7ludten4rfg9qrjhkdjbffg6lt_xwp...@mail.gmail.com
