On 04/11/2012 12:03 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 19:30, Julian Taylor > <jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> 640940 [0] and 665998 should probably still be resolved in the upload to >> unstable. > > you didn't seem to have addressed Jakub reply in 640940... > >> ftw. numpy 1.6 has been uploaded in ubuntu precise three weeks ago and >> the world did not fall apart yet. I also expect a smooth transition >> thanks to the excellent preparation by you and jakub. >> >> [0] crappy patch for it: >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/python-numpy/precise/view/head:/debian/patches/search-multiarch-paths.patch > > ...or better you did for ubuntu but didn't communicate it back to > Debian, not helping, sorry. > > Cheers,
no reason to get so hostile. You didn't reply to Jakub either so I wrongly assumed your rejection of the gcc type patch still stood. what about bug 665998 (dh_numpy3)? I guess a sed s/python/python3/ dh_numpy > dh_numpy3 would probably be enough? Or should that better be solved with a single helper? I think it should be fixed before other packages start adding unnecessary manual depends. Cheers, Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f85bea5.4080...@googlemail.com
