Hi Barry (2011.11.29_18:00:07_+0200) > While chatting about this in irc (#debian-python on oftc), I mistakenly > thought that PyPy supported PEP 3147, but I think it's only PEP 3149. 3147 > shouldn't be that difficult to support - what is your thought on adding that > to PyPy? It would mean one less symlink farm.
One symlink farm for the entire PyPy (!py3k PyPy) sounds good. It'd even be very unexpected for a pure-python module to have code differences to have code differences between PyPy and cPython. But it's quite plausible (although probably still rare-ish) for modules with extensions to have variation in pure-python code. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111130165857.gg29...@bach.rivera.co.za
