On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 23:52, Piotr Ożarowski <pi...@debian.org> wrote: > [Sandro Tosi, 2011-11-07] >> OK, let's try to move it forward somehow: so Piotr, you'd like numpy >> pydist file to have 2 lines. >> >> numpy python-numpy >> numpy_strict python-numpy-api$N, python-numpy (>= $foo) >> >> is that correct? as Jakub, I fail to see the advantage of the first >> line, and the second one would still be generated by dh_numpy - what > > Jakub is right, first line is not needed, that's dh_python2's default > anyway. > >> same question as above - how much do we have to try to complicate our >> lives in the pydist + dh_numpy instead of just use dh_numpy, that will >> generate the correct dependencies no matter the python helper the >> package is using? > > you still have to store these dependencies somewhere, no? (unless you > want to generate dh_numpy at build time) so why not do it in > dh_python2-compatible way?
I was actually thinking of sed-ding a template with some variables from d/rules, but that's an implementation detail. But storing the info in the pydist would mean I'd need to parse it to extract the data I need to pass to dh_numpy template (if we're going to have one) or make dh_numpy read the pydist file at runtime (that could be nice too indeed) and it seems to be missing the abi$M information. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPdtAj0N26Co=oeojdwbg76vo2fvumus71h_qkykjtaoijv...@mail.gmail.com
