[Barry Warsaw, 2011-07-27] > Martin Pitt discovered this problem in dh_python3: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/809951 > > Even in a post-PEP 3149 world, Python 3.2 itself can import untagged .so files > (which preserves backward compatibility). python3-gobject's build system does > not tag .so files even when it's built with Python 3.2.
imagine this: * package built with python3.1 * dh_python3 doesn't add a tag * python3 package upgrade starts requiring python3.2 instead of python3.1 python3.2 will fail with untagged foo.so, no? > I'm not entirely sure how to handle this, but I think this bit of code in > dh_python3 should not hardcode vers==31: I assumed that build systems that do not know about changes in Python 3.2 will not use new location (/usr/lib/python3/) and dh_python3 recognizes /usr/lib/python3.X/ paths correctly. I guess I can change it to use python3's tag if 3.1 is not in a list of supported Python 3 versions (but I still think that the build system should be fixed in the first place) > Probably, it should query the version of Python being used, with something > like: > > $ python3 -c "import sysconfig; print(sysconfig.get_config_var('SO'))" > .cpython-32mu.so I will change debpython.tools.get_magic_tags_map to use this (right now it uses imp.get_tag() and fix tagged_extname) -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110727202806.gx11...@piotro.eu