On 03/30/2011 08:42 PM, Clint Adams wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:33:06PM +0200, Yiannis Kakavas wrote: >> I admit I didn't pay much attention to formality, aiming at >> functionality as soon as possible, but I guess the changes needed to >> conform to debian policy are not that many. Currently lintian outputs >> these warnings >> >> W: creepy source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/postinst >> W: creepy source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.1) >> W: creepy: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 1 >> W: creepy: wrong-bug-number-in-closes l94:#nnnn >> W: creepy: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/creepymap >> >> and also there is the matter of how python applications should be >> packaged in debian ( currently I use python-support ) > > So I am relatively ignorant of the Python policies, but I believe > that easy_install in the postinst is a no-no. > > Could someone please correct me or elaborate? > python-tweepy recently was changed from ITP to RFP ( Bug#581602 ), if there is interest from someone to take over that would be great.
>> I'd be more than happy to help in any way > > Great news. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d937ea0.7090...@gmail.com
