On 07/13/2010 08:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 juillet > 2010, vers 23:05, Jakub Wilk <[email protected]> disait : > >>> I'm working on package that uses CDBS > >> That's not a very good choice. > > Why?
Because cdbs is an unmaintainable beast of Makefiles. I'm not sure who is willing to keep the Python parts in there working. Since we have dh, which is a sane piece of code with a sane upstream, most new packages use dh. And I know several people who are willing to update dh to work with new Python versions/packaging changes if necessary. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
