I'm not very experienced, so somethings in this mail may be factually *wrong*. Please correct anything in this mail that is wrong.
On 06/21/2010 02:49 AM, Janos Guljas wrote: > RFS: python-pyftpdlib > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor my package "python-pyftpdlib". debian/watch: Maybe prefix your homepage before the download location? Currently uscan gives me an error. > $ uscan --verbose > -- Scanning for watchfiles in . > -- Found watchfile in ./debian > -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: > http://pyftpdlib.googlecode.com/files/pyftpdlib-(.*).tar.gz > uscan warning: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage > http://pyftpdlib.googlecode.com/files/ failed: 404 Not Found > -- Scan finished Changing it to this worked: > version=3 > http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/ > http://pyftpdlib.googlecode.com/files/pyftpdlib-(.*).tar.gz (I think it would be a good idea to do this, so that when a DD reviews your package, it would be easier to download). You don't seem to have an explicit build-dep on python. Python Policy [1] seems to require that. Lintian gives me one informational tag. Note: I know nothing about how important it is. If you already knew about it, ignore my mentioning it. > I: python-pyftpdlib: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration > N: > N: The package ships a .html or .pdf file under /usr/share/doc/, which are > N: usually documentation, but it does not register anything in doc-base. > N: (Files under an examples directory are excluded.) > N: > N: Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 9.10 (Registering Documents using > N: doc-base) for details. > N: > N: Severity: wishlist, Certainty: possible > N: [1]: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ap-build_dependencies.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c1efdf9.60...@gmail.com
