On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:05:49PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 01:39, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Please reply to debian-python with fix reports or reports of false > >> positives.
> > Not quite either of these, but in a similar vein, I've filed bug #584833 > > against gourmet with the patch from Ubuntu for this issue as part of regular > > due diligence on the Ubuntu side > thanks for that > > so gourmet should probably be exempted from the MBF. > but it seems it has more than what was fixed in -3 revision. Boh, you're right. :/ Sorry, I hadn't checked that the patch was comprehensive because the app's been working fine for me on python 2.6, so I guess these are all corner cases. I'll follow up on this (and yes, the suggestion to omit from the MBF is null and void) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100609191514.ga1...@dario.dodds.net
