"Jakub Wilk" <jw...@debian.org> wrote:
>* Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com>, 2010-06-05, 19:31: >>+ will represent the current default Debian Python version. The >>+ binary package <package>python3</package> will represent the current >>+ Debian Python3 version. As far as is reasonable, python and python3 >>+ should be treated as separate runtime systems with minimal >>+ interdependencies. Except as noted, policy for Python 3 is the >>same > >Either "Python 3" or "Python3" spelling should be used consistently. I'm >in favor of the former. > Agreed. >>+ built or byte-compiled for these. The supported interface to this >>+ file is <file>/usr/share/python/pyversions</file>. The Python 3 >>+ interface is through <file>/usr/share/python/py3versions</file>. >> </p> > >Huh? Are we going to move pyversions out of /usr/bin/? That would break >hell lot of packages. > No. Mistake on my part. Thanks for catching. >>+Build-Depends: python3-all-dev (>= 3.1-1) > >This will trigger lintian's build-depends-on-1-revision. Good point. Will fix. Thanks for reviewing. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3a72428c-795f-4555-95ff-1dbb093f6...@email.android.com
