On May 18, 2010, at 02:30 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >As is usual for discussions involving more than one person, we didn't all >leave the room with quite the same understanding. I think 2.7 as default is a >stretch goal at most. We want 2.7 as a supported version, but I didn't sense >a lot of appetite for pushing hard for 2.7 as default.
These things happen. :) Still, I'd like to make 2.7 for Maverick the goal, but of course, we'll obviously make that decision only once we've gather enough information. >We did make the assumption that by the time 2.7 is released Debian will be in >freeze. Yep. I heard rumors of a June-ish freeze, but I guess nothing official has yet been decided. >Another important point that I think deserves more emphasis is that we agreed >that the testing done in Ubuntu for 2.7, will also be done against the Debian >archive as well. There was a strong consensus in the group that Ubuntu should >take great care to avoid doing anything that would accrue a technical debt >that has to be paid in Debian (I found this a notable change from similar >discussions in previous release cycles). I completely agree. I've added some emphasis to the previously mentioned wiki page. Thanks, -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
