On Sat, 2010-30-01 at 21:03 +0530, Umang wrote: > However, my > foolib will have 99.9% of my code. foolib _is_ my program, it's not a
Why not just have foo.py then ? There *are* python programs written this way. I think you can still use them as libraries if you use the __main__ convention at the end. The classes can always be separated at a later date. The 'import' mechanism is one of the really nice things about python (vs perl). > library. foo simply starts the whole process - parses command line > options, initiates classes and calls the appropriate methods. -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
