It seems my message didn't passed through, so I re-send it, I hope with a better fate.
Data: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:43:25 +0200 Da: Luca Falavigna <dktrkr...@debian.org> A: Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> Cc: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org Oggetto: Re: RFS: python-coverage 3.0.1-1 Hi Ben, I reviewed a bit python-coverage, here are some suggestions: debian/control: * Build-Depend on debhelper (>= 7.3.5). debian/python-coverage.dirs: * Useless. debian/python-coverage.install: * I'd use debian/manpages to install python-coverage.1. debian/rules: * Why did you rename /usr/bin/coverage to /usr/bin/python-coverage? * Pass --single-version-externally-managed to setup.py install. * You could eventually adopt rules.tiny to simplify reading. debian/watch: * "Newest version on remote site is 3.1~b1, local version is 3.0.1", you could want to exclude beta releases. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna <dktrkr...@debian.org> `. `' `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
