Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:36:09PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: >> Done, omitting a reported false positive and a few packages fixed in the >> meantime. >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org;tag=python2.6 > > Thanks. > > Question: why the severity is only "important"? > > Shouldn't we aim at uploading python 2.6 to unstable really soon now? In > that respect, if I understand the problems you mentioned in the first > post correctly, those bugs should be better made RC.
I guess they will be RC once python2.6 is uploaded to unstable (and made the default) since they will FTBFS. That won't impede python2.6 being uploaded soon. Cheers, Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
