* Jakub Wilk <uba...@users.sf.net>, 2009-05-29, 21:01:
What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python
application under? DPMT or PAPT?
And, is there some recommended binary package naming scheme for such
packages?
I am asking those questions, because I intend[1] to package hg-git[2],
a plugin for Mercurial (maintained by PAPT).
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/531028
[2] http://hg-git.github.com/
As there were no definite answers to my questions, I decided that:
1. I'd like to package hg-git under the PAPT umbrella.
Rationale: Mercurial is maintained by PAPT and it's debatable whether
any application (but Mercurial) would ever import that module.
2. The binary package will be named mercurial-git. (mercurial-hg-git
would be a more consistent name, but would violate the DRY principle.)
Rationale: trac and docutils plugins are already using a scheme without
the "python-" prefix.
If anybody disagree, please feel free to veto.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
