On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote: > I am surprised I am actually the 6th most active. Pretty cool. :)
I am surprised to still be in the top 10 (hertzog)… it means the team is not so active as one would expect. :-) Anyway, I'm fine with git as well but I'm not convinced it's that important. You should also look at the perl team, they are using git on some packages only and have not yet decided to mass-convert from SVN to Git. One of the reasons of the block is that Git makes it difficult to do operations on all the repositories. And for a global update, you're forced to use tools like "mr" (and even that won't add new package automatically). Furthermore, Git alone doesn't mean much, the questions is whether we have to use git-buildpackage, topgit and so on. Hence I would rather suggest a per-package decision for the switch. I won't cry if SVN continues to be used. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
