On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 02:23:21AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > On ven, 2008-04-04 at 19:08 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > On the other hand, I???m not sure such symbolic links are necessary for > > > debugging libraries; at least they are not for usual libraries. > > > > The debug library names all have the same -py24 and -py25 decoration > > as the non-debug ones found in libboost-python-dev. The symlinks are > > to support linking with the default Python runtime. This may not be > > "usual", but how else do you deal with a library supporting two Python > > runtimes? > > This is all good for regular libraries, but as they are decorated, the > debuglink information added by dh_strip should point to the decorated > debugging library location, so you shouldn???t need the undecorated > symbolic link for the debugging libraries. Ah, now I see your confusion. For a "standard" library, you're perfectly right. The -dbg library has the same SONAME as the non-debug version. Boost is different: they decorate the debug library name (and SONAME) with an extra "-d". So the debug versions do need the default runtime symlinks. Cheers, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
