* Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-10 09:17:54 +0100]: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 02:20:26PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > So python-docutils-writers-odtwriter would be the right name in theory, > > but this doesn't make sense, indeed. > > Does anybody insist on that name? If not, I’m going to update the long > description to mention the relationship to python-docutils, which > probably would have avoided that bug report in the first place.
Personally, I think that package name is ludicrous; python-odtwriter seems fine, this kind of "extend another package" package is an exceptional case, so I think it makes sense to bend the naming rules a little. -- mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
