On 05/12/07 at 13:37 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > >> 1. Why is there the build-conflict in the first place? This is the > >> question to original maintainers (Marco, Alexandre, Jose, Matthias) > > > > I added the build-conflict because without it, dpkg-shlibdeps would > > make them depend exclusively on blas and lapack, instead of depending > > on the virtual package (because all other packages provide blas and > > lapack) > > The packages should not be installed on the buildds anyway, so I think > ti shoudl work without build-conflicts.
There's no garantee about which packages are *not* installed on the buildds, since packages are not uninstalled after builds. Build-conflicts is the good way to solve that. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
