[Steve Langasek, 22.03.2007] > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:36:08PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > yes, but since package is depending only on python-dev (and not > > python-all-dev), > > python-<system> should assume "current" by default (and add it to > > XB-Python-Version > > so that there will be no problems with recompilation of pyc files when 2.6 > > will become default) > > hmm, three things: > > - relying on Build-Depends to indicate whether a package builds "current" or > "all" doesn't seem to leave a way to differentiate between packages that > follow the new policy and really /are/ binNMUable, from those that don't > follow the new policy but obviously still need to b-d on python-*dev. > - Build-Depends information is only in the Sources file, not in Packages; > detecting packages that need binNMUs requires trawling the Packages file, > it would be nice if it didn't require correlating both Packages and > Sources
Build-Depends is used only at build time. Python-Versions field is in binary package. > - having a package's build rules behavior vary in response to the contents > of the build-depends is unprecedented and, IMHO, a very bad idea. > Basically, this would eliminate a very important check that the maintainer > hasn't made a mistake along the line -- it's far better to get a build > failure in such a case than to get a misbuilt package. so lets keep "current" in XS-P-V (and not only in XB-P-V) BTW: I'm building my python modules for *all* supported Python version at build time, even for arch:all packages - just to make sure they compile fine. > > > As I understood it, "current" indicates that the package should only be > > > built for one version of python, the version that is currently the > > > default version in Debian. > > > not necessary default (see "current, >=2.X" where 2.X is greater than > > default) > > but for single version only, yes. I understand it this way, but > > apparently I don't understand "current", though. > > I don't think it was intended that "current, >= 2.X" be used to > *successfully* build packages when 2.X is greater than the currently > available python-dev. if python-dev (>=2.X) | python2.X-dev is not available during build process, it will just fail and maintainer will not be able to upload such package, am I right? BTW: "current, >=2.4" helped me a lot with packaging gaupol when python2.3 was default -- -=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-
pgpEOkapNSqUL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
