On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:14:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:03:37PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 à 14:51 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:47:37PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > If this is a public extension, this goes completely against the spirit > > > > of the policy and should not be allowed. It just means more packages > > > > having to migrate simultaneously with python-defaults. > > > > It's not against the spirit of what was discussed in Mexico, it's just > > > against the spirit of what you personally think. > > > I'm not the one who suddenly declared all packages complying with the > > "old" policy RC-buggy. > > WTF? Neither did the release team. > > > Do I understand that we can drop all the multi-version stuff now? > > Who's "we"?
Please (and it's meant as much to both of you) that part of the thread is going nowhere useful. We can avoid this easily, shall we ? -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp0DpVKLrfwH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
