On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:59:45PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > What would you suggest doing about "hybrid" packages which are primarily > applications, but also want to make their modules available to other > Python programs? Two examples here are pychecker and epydoc (both > maintained by me). Right now, for those packages, I stick the .py, .pyc > and .pyo files in site-python, compile the modules for the default > version of Python, and then live with the inefficiency of recompiling > them for non-default Python versions and/or the possibility that root > will recompile them for the wrong version. This isn't a great solution, > but it works. However, some folks don't seem to like this solution very > much, and I've definitely gotten some pushback about the structure of > these packages.
Sorry to reply to my own mail, but after re-reading this, I realized it wasn't clear that I wrote this in the context of, "if applications were to be treated differently than libraries..." KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
