[Joss, not keeping the people addressed you are ranting at, is just another point of rudeness]
For your wrong claims: There is no private discussion, the meeting was public. AFAIK Debconf is public as well. I don't know how this is Vancouver related, I wasn't there, nor did I meet Andreas before. Yes, for myself, I won't start the discussion now, because there is other unrelated work, which needs to be done before (you're happily invited to work on the C++ ABI change). Matthias PS: Looking at your choice of tone, it might be easier for others to work with you, if you limit yourself to technical and policy things. Josselin Mouette writes: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > - python policy/implementation needs review - doko and aba will discuss > > that on debconf probably > > Is it the new way things work since the Vancouver meeting? Discussing > things privately instead of using the dedicated mailing lists? I'd have > thought that this list was the place to discuss a new python policy, > instead of implicitly accepting that the release team becomes > responsible for all policies in the project. > > There's a need for change, this is for sure. If we agree on this list > for new rules, I'd volunteer to update the python policy accordingly. > Then, we could apply the changes during the python 2.4 transition, as > you suggested. What exactly makes you think there's a need for > discussing this privately? > -- > .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ > : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] > `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
