Terry Hancock writes: > On Monday 17 November 2003 09:22 am, Florent Rougon wrote: > > Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Le dim 16/11/2003 à 11:34, Matthias Klose a écrit : > > >> There is no reason why /usr/share/<module> should be disallowed. > > > > > > That depends on whether .pyo files really are architecture-independent. > > > At least the generated files are different on different architectures. > > > > Do you have a reference for this? I googled a little bit but did not > > find any reliable source for this information. In fact, the Python (2.3) > > tutorial implies the contrary (for the current optimizer, not as an > > atemporal guarantee, though): > > The auxilliary files that Python generates such as .pyc / .pyo > are not intended to be relied on to be portable. This is > not so much a problem with architectures, but it is a very [...]
you miss the point. the question is about difference between architectures within the same python version.
