Florent Rougon writes: > Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> > I'm not sure of the usefulness of this approach. > > Even if python is one of my favorite language, it's still too young compared > > wit perl and it's staility. python is still evolving, and we have not, > > afaik, > > sufficent warranties of what will change and what will not. > > I don't agree at all on this point. The backward-incompatible > changes in Python are well handled, you have plenty of time to take > them into account (thanks to the "from __future__ import whatever" > statements). huh? potato was released with 1.5.2, woody with 2.1 as default, woody+1 probably with 2.4. So someone upgrading faces the features deprecated in 2.0 and removed in 2.1... Ore freeze python at 1.5.2 as other distributors do. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
