Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> s/python-base/python/.
I would prefer to keep "python-base" because it reflects that it does
not contain the whole python distribution but rather the basic modules.
> > - I'm not sure in 2.1.2.2 that /usr/lib/python/site-packages is a good
> > name... maybe /usr/share/python/site-packages instead. (After all,
> > the things should be arch independent.) I'd be happy to code up the
> > symlink thingamajig for 2.1.2.2 if nobody's working on it.
>
> And what about binary dependent site packages?
I previously propose to install binary indep. files in /usr/share/pythonX.Y
and binary dep. files is /usr/lib/pythonX.Y.
I proposed to change sys.path this way:
/usr/local/lib/python<X>.<Y>/site-packages
/usr/local/share/python<X>.<Y>/site-packages
/usr/lib/python<X>.<Y>/site-packages
/usr/share/python<X>.<Y>/site-packages
(there are probably some missing items, but this is the main idea)
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://marant.org
