Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2.3. Module Package Names > ------------------------- > > Python module packages should be named for the primary module > provided. The naming convention for module `foo' is `python-foo'. > Packages which include multiple modules may additionally include > provides for those modules using the same convention.
What happened to the libfoo-python idea (for consistency with the perl and, presumably, java convention)? I'm personally happy with python-foo, but understand the arguments in favor consistency. Is there good reason not to adopt that now?
