Stefan Gybas wrote: > I would also prefer such a scheme. What about colons in package names? > I know that they are currently not allowed but is there a technical > reason not to allow them? According to footnote 14 in the packaging > manual, colons used to be legal. Was this changed when epochs were > introduced?
Probably. It would rock if we could use the exact module name as the package, I agree. :-) -- see shy jo
