"J�r�me Marant" wrote: > > I'm coming back with naming problems. > I have 2 unit test suites called pyunit and ompyunit. Do I have to > leave package names as is ? In the first case, renaming could > simply be python-unit, but what about ompyunit ?
I would suggest python-pyunit and python-ompyunit. I do understand the problem, at first glance, I would have named the first one python-unit, but then I don't know what you would call the second one. > I wonder why library bindings could not be named libsomething-python > (for instance, libgtk-python, liborbit-python, etc ...) like perl bindings > and python modules (that are not bindings) python-* (when possible). After looking at perl package naming, I agree with you. I think it should be that way. -- Shae Matijs Erisson - http://www.webwitches.com/~shae/ VirtualPairProgramming Wanted - Linux/Emacs/Python/Speak Freely
