Hi Charles,

* Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> [2025-02-08 10:02]:
We are not going to solve that overnight, but I feel that we need to agree on the minimum, which is:

- it is not a taboo,
- it is not an attack,
- it is not a misconduct.

+1

By the way, for the full disclosure, and also to counter the argument that using ChatGPT to write a text in a language that I am not comfortable with was an act of carelessness in which I dumped low-quality text produced with no effort, here is the inputs I gave:
[...]
For the record and notwithstanding my humorous take on model collapse, I happen to think that it is absolutely okay to use LLMs like this, because their primary function is text generation, and they do this very well. Arguably better than me, at the very least.

And let's not forget we are talking about a draft here, reviewed and refined by someone with domain knowledge at that. This is not someone replacing critical Linux kernel code with untested Copilot drivel, nor an attempt to cheat an exam or fake a scientific publication.

Have a nice week-end,
Likewise!

Cheers
Timo

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling                                       │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀   ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to