Hello Adam, Am Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 05:35:52PM +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Sat, 2023-08-12 at 15:54 +0000, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > If I try to mail e.g. Marcos Fouces <mar...@debian.org>, this no > > longer works. I get the following error message: > > > > Contacting DSA is generally a better way to ask about infrastructure > things than filing bugs on high-level pseudo-packages.
Thanks, then I know this for the future. > > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) > > failed: > > > > marcos.fou...@gmail.com > > host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [173.194.79.26] > > SMTP error from remote mail server after pipelined end of data: > > 550-5.7.26 This mail is unauthenticated, which poses a security > > risk to the > > 550-5.7.26 sender and Gmail users, and has been blocked. The > > sender must > > 550-5.7.26 authenticate with at least one of SPF or DKIM. For > > this message, > > 550-5.7.26 DKIM checks did not pass and SPF check for > > [helgefjell.de] did not > > 550-5.7.26 pass with ip: [82.195.75.114]. The sender should visit > > 550-5.7.26 > > https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication for > > 550 5.7.26 instructions on setting up authentication. v26- > > 20020aa7d65a000000b005231f55294dsi4996663edr.385 - gsmtp > > > > The IP 82.195.75.114 resolves to > > 114.75.195.82.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 114.64-26.75.195.82.in- > > addr.arpa. > > 114.64-26.75.195.82.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer > > mailly.debian.org. > > > > And of course, SPF/DKIM checks for my domain (helgefjell.de) fail for > > this IP, which is @debian.org. > > > > The DKIM signature warning has nothing to do with the forwarding, or > the involvement of debian.org at all. The reason that check fails is > that your mail has no DKIM signature, so obviously can't have a valid > one. Signing your mail would probably make gmail a lot happier with it > in general. (As a side note, the BTS breaks many common DKIM signature > strategies, but that's a different issue.) Sigh. Directly gmail accepts it. > The general issue is being worked on, as time and resources allow. Thanks a lot! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
