Hey folks, On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 05:40:25PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > >Thank you for your work during the sprint. Here is some feedback as >requested:
+1 - thanks for getting together to make Debian stuff better! >On Sat 28 Nov 2020 at 06:49PM +01, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >> Namespaces for groups >> -------------------------------- >> >> Currently we do have a frontend to enforce a specific naming for >> groups (-team). We are thinking about removing that restriction. We >> would love to get some feedback about it. Unless no-one objects with >> some good reasoning we plan to remove it during the next months. > >I navigate to resources on salsa by either typing full URLs into my >browser, or typing URLs into my shell after 'git clone'. I am very >rarely logged in to the web interface. > >Having a defined naming for groups makes it significantly easier for me >to correctly type the URL for the repo I want on my first try. > >I suspect that without the -team suffix I'd end up having to use salsa's >search engine much more often. I would prefer not to have to do that. Nod. The -team suffix works really well for me, similarly. I'll be honest, it also gives me a warm fuzzy feeling about namespace. :-) For me these days, lots of Debian work is concentrated into teams so the -team suffix for groups helps to organise and demonstrate that team structure. Have people been pushing the other way - to remove the suffix? Just curious. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code is in use on a military site..." -- Simon Booth
