❦ 4 octobre 2019 16:57 +02, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org>: >>> That would just lead to packages using these to no longer including the >>> Vcs-* fields... There are some valid reasons to host packages on >>> services such as GitLab or GitHub such as when they are hosted there as >>> part of the upstream project and/or for better cooperation with >>> upstream. > > It's very much fine if you still host it on Salsa, and ask upstream to > pull from your repository. > > Besides this, I found such cases pretty rare, and mostly, we get > upstream doing wrong/bad packaging, having a non-consistent with the > Debian archive debian/changelog (because they don't care our release > cycle and such), etc. Even with a very cooperative upstream, I don't see > how you would get a single and unique debian/changelog, when most also > care about Ubuntu. Do you have such concret example where Debian can use > the upstream repository without a single change?
Not sure if this is what you have in mind, but: - https://github.com/Exa-Networks/exabgp/tree/debian/sid - https://github.com/edenhill/kafkacat/tree/debian -- Use the "telephone test" for readability. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
