Bas Wijnen wrote: > note that the proposal is not to say "our users must not be allowed to use > github". It's "our developers must not be allowed to force contributors to > use github".
Scott Kitterman wrote: > No one is forced to use any VCS to maintain Debian packages. If you don't > want to talk to GitHub, send a patch to the BTS. I believe it may be useful to think along the "preferred form for modifications" clause of the GPL. Which is the "preferred form for modifications" of Debian packaging? As I understand policy, currently it's the source package. If that doesn't reflect actual practice, that might be good reason to change policy. In any case, I'd always expect the "preferred form" of all packages to be available on the Debian infrastructure: one must not depend on any external services, free or not, in order to be able to obtain it. So, if Git-based packaging becomes the norm, it is my understanding that the master Git repo of all packages must be hosted on Debian servers. Clearly, maintainers can still host their own working copy wherever they would like to, and there's no requirement to make it publicly accessible through a free service, or at all. Gerardo
