On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:23:07 +0200, Vincent Bernat writes: >> so, why isn't it enough to recommend those things? > >Because without uniformity, we make it harder for people to contribute.
i detest unwarranted, imposed, uniformity. i *love* consistency. we have had consistency in the distribution for ages. we don't need uniform workflows. what good can come from reducing diversity and actively probibiting flexiblity? and why do you insist on micromanaging the workflow i've got to use? i thought we wanted to produce a good distribution, not force everybody gratuitously to use the same tools. or do you also plan to insist that your roofing contractor only uses <insert brand> tools and only cuts the rafters with your preferred saw? regards az -- Alexander Zangerl + GPG Key 2FCCF66BB963BD5F + http://snafu.priv.at/ "[Perl] isn't a programming language, it's a thousand special case rules flying in close formation." -- Peter da Silva
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
