On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 03:54:00PM +0000, Ulrike Uhlig wrote: >Jonathan Carter: >> Dear Planet administrators and debian-project >> >> Based on the very short amount of discussion we've had so far, I'd like >> to make the following changes to https://wiki.debian.org/PlanetDebian >> >> I've scaled the wording down from what I originally suggested on >> debian-project so that it doesn't include the term "smear campaign. > >Thanks for working on this! > >> Under the section "What Can I Post On Planet", I would like to add the >> following points: >> >> """ >> 4. Avoid posting personal fights or insults. Planet Debian is not an >> appropriate medium for this. > >> 5. Debian's community standards fully apply to Planet Debian, that >> includes following [[https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct|Debian's >> Code of Conduct]]. >> >> 6. Posts that are syndicated on Planet Debian that doesn't conform to > >"that don't" instead of "that doesn't"
+1 >> our community standards may result in removal of a post or even an >> entire blog. In such a case, please reach out to the Planet > >"entire feed" ? +1 >"In this case" instead of "In such a case" ? > >> administrators before re-adding your blog yourself. > >"before" or "instead" ? "instead" is better, I think. >> """ > >It all sounds good. Yup! >> On #6 I was tempted to add "When a blog is removed, the committer should >> add a comment listing the posts that resulted in it being removed", but >> not sure if that's overloading it a bit too much. > >I think this is useful. Maybe "When a blog is removed, the committer >must (or should?) state a reason for the removal. If unsure, please >reach out to the Planet administrators." Sounds good to me. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast." Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
